Wednesday, October 19, 2005

Lesbian Right's

Recently I spoke about the importance of maintaining logical consistence. For instance if you believe it is wrong to consume meat it logically follows that you don’t eat any animals. You don’t just haphazardly choose which animals are fine to eat and which are not right to consume, based on some arbitrary moral stance of say-- cuteness or size.

Leftism has problems maintaining logical consistency-- mostly they ignore it all together, championing themselves as pragmatists-- but Guadalupe Benitez takes this form irrational thinking to a new height. Guadalupe, an announced lesbian is suing Dr. Brody for refusing to artificially inseminate her. Guadalupe and homosexual activists are up in arms crying discrimination-- that a healthcare worker has no right to discriminate against lesbians in a free country.

Well, sort of but not really. In a free country the law does not discriminate against individuals and minorities. But the law is not discriminating against Guadalupe. Lesbians have the right to receive insemination from any willing doc, they have the right to inseminate themselves if need be, thye have the right to find a willing doc to do the procedure, they have the right to hire a quack from the classifieds if that toots their horn, they even have the right to receive insemination from an untrained circus midget midget willing to do it for a six pack and a baggie of tobacco. What Guadalupe does not have the right to do is coerce a particular individual to perform the insemination. This government coercion is in direct conflict with Dr. Brody’s right to be a free thinking, self determined individual. It is possible that Dr. Brody’s employer would see differently and fire the doctor for refusing to inseminate the lesbian and that would be the employer’s right, but it is not the government‘s right.

This is not an issue of homosexual rights it's an issue of individual rights. Couls she refuse the insemination if Guadalupe was a drug addict. What if she was mean and abusive? What if she openly supported the murder of Catholics?Doctors have the right to refuse patients for any number of reasons. religous choice is only of them.



At 12:09 PM, Blogger mike king said...

Mr Music said...

I want to tell you all a story 'bout a GTA urban wife

Who had a teenage daughter who attended Harper Valley Junior High

Well her daughter came home one afternoon and didn't even stop to play

She said Mom I got a note here from the Harper So-Cons in the G.T.A.

The note said Misses Urban Girl, you're wearing your dresses way too high

It's reported you've been talking to the youth and ethnics, women’s groups and gays

And we don't believe you ought to be a bringing up your little girl this way

It was signed by the secretary, Harper So-Cons GTA.

Well, it happened So-Cons G.T.A. were gonna meet that very afternoon

They were sure surprised when Misses Urban Girl wore her miniskirt into the room

And as she walked up to the blackboard I still recall the words she had to say

She said, I'd like to address this meeting of the Harper So-Cons G.T.A.

Well there's John Reynolds, sitting there and seven times he's asked me for a date

Messrs. Flaherty and Clement always missing that retirement is just 4 months away

And Mr. Capobianco can you tell us what your smokin’ that makes you blind

And shouldn't Peter Kent be reading news not playing with you wasting all his time

Well Mr Harper couldn't be here 'cause he’s filling sandbags for the bunker again

He may as well get ready cuz the writing’s on the wall – “you loser has-been”

Then you have the nerve to tell me you think that as a mother I'm not fit

Well this is just a little piece of urban Canada where none of you are ever gonna fit.

No, I wouldn't put you on because it really did, it happened just this way

The day my Mama socked it to the Harper So-Cons G.T.A.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home