Friday, October 26, 2007

Ed and his Pink Hat go Drinking

A reaction to Ed Stelmach's royalty plan

First off, drilling levels will be fine through this winter. Companies have already bought their land rights, so they are already committed to winter drilling projects. This will be great for Ed and the Progressive Communist party of Alberta. Ed will be able to sit back on his throne, sometime in mid February and point triumphantly to the record drilling levels and say “see, helping Albertans did not deter drilling. We must not be afraid of the big oil companies”. Most people will cheer and then once summer comes, and the election is over, and pink Eddie is re-elected, the industry will come to a grinding halt, but the pubic won’t be interested in the debate anymore. The lack of drilling will be attributed to a downturn in the industry, a bust cycle, possibly blamed on a high dollar or more access to middle east oil.

The big energy companies like Encana, Talisman, Conoco, CNRL… etc will spend their dollars elsewhere (see Saskatchewan) out of principle. They will make a stand because they know who’s next in line (see looting feds) for their profits. People think it is hard to move a giant corporation like Encana. Well its not, Encana is just a bunch of engineers. Pipelines, compressors and pipelines can be rebuilt (cost can be spread out amonst competitors) or in a lot of circumstance already exist on other parts. All the equipment associated with oil production is owned by Albertans— the rigs, wellheads, pipe, welding units, trucks, trailers, tools, and heavy equipment are all owned by Albertans who rent their capital to energy producers. The energy companies have no stake in any of this capital expenditure.

Some other points:

So the Alberta government decides to raise royalty rates on oil 20%— and oh by the way they want to get into the bitumen upgrading game as well. This is a direct transfer of wealth from the people who extract bitumen to the people that upgrade it. As I said in my last post this is the moral landscape of the mixed economy.

The feds created the NEP (the nationalizing of the energy industry) and they crippled the province. The government bought all the foreign owned companies for 10 times their worth and then watched the industry die. Then they got out of the energy game by reselling all the same companies that they had just bought for inflated prices for 10 cents on the dollar. Next the government spends tax payer dollars in order to create incentives for rich oil giants to drill again. Then, predictably energy companies use our money to drill again (sometimes knowingly dusters—very funny to hear these stories). 20 years later, companies are drilling at ultra high levels with their own money and the government steps in raises the royalty taxes on oil to potentially 50%. I wonder what happens nex?

I hate having to hear people say “A slowdown is good for the province” —huh 8.5% unemployment is better than 4%. Investment leaving the province is better than investment coming into the province. Stagnation is never beneficial. Alberta has bought into the Canukistan dream.


At 5:59 PM, Anonymous Manuel said...

should have voted dinning like me....instead of everyones second choice stelmach, I laugh at it, but at the same time my job doesn't depend on oil and gas

At 7:45 PM, Blogger angryroughneck said...

My choice was Morton.

At 11:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, hell just give in to the BORG! Import Chavez or better yet Putin to run our "economy", for us. I'm sure Ed has never turned down a handout from guvmint, being a farmer an all. Besides, I liked it when I was unemployed after the NEP. I didn't have to pay my mortgage!

At 4:26 AM, Blogger BrianFH said...

Have you heard about my discovery, the TCD? It seems that cutting taxes increases government revenues, because it enables and attracts more commercial and consumer economic activity, proportionately, than the Tax Cuts represent, so overall take rises. Hence the Tax Cutters' Dilemma. Such persons and even politicians are trying to reduce the size and impact of government, but the more they cut taxes, the greater its revenue and resources. Since it is not possible not to use those resources (even saving is a form of investment, in others' hands) the impact and power of government is thereby increased.

So it comes down to: cut taxes or reduce government size; Pick One. In order to reduce government's impact, it is necessary to raise taxes until revenue falls to the point that government is cutting back everything in sight in order not to go bankrupt (after a stiff run of deficit spending, granted). So Less is More! More is Less! And Ed will surely achieve the latter.

Aren't God's Little Ironies amusing?

At 5:41 PM, Blogger SUZANNE said...

Sorry to spam your blog this way...I just wanted to get in touch...

Dear Blogger

This is to inform you that Opinions Canada, a Canadian political blogs aggregator, has added your blog to its blogroll. If you have already accepted to be a member of Opinions Canada, thank you for your participation. Your presence is greatly appreciated. Otherwise, I hope that inclusion in OC is agreeable to you. OC includes a wide range of politcal opinions. The website is in the process of being revamped. Please update your link if you are still using the URL. You can check it out here:

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to email me at with Opinions Canada in the header.

Opinions Canada


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home