Wednesday, July 19, 2006

How Terror is Funded

How do Hezbollah, Hamas, Al-Queada afford to maintain highly advanced weaponry and guerilla forces. Don’t tell me wealthy financiers like Bin Laden can afford to sustain numerous military programs— military programs that have the ability to stockpile 13,000 Hi-Tec Chinese rockets? Montreal charity scams couldn’t build a single gold palace or even feed a single caliphate harem. How do rogue nations gain the capital required for nuclear ambitions? Taxation— no. If technology is purchased in Dollars or Euros then how many unregistered falafel stands does it take to finance a nuclear generator. And these nations supposedly fund Hezbollah, Al Queada and Hamas? So where does the money come from?.

I’ll tell you where. Bank Loans. Bank loans from American and European banks. Sure taxation from a repressed and economically stagnant culture can’t pay for weapon technologies up front but it can pay the interest on the massive bank loans which could fund their purchase and development.
Why would banks do this?

Banks are encouraged to send highly risky loans with high margins—a loan of a billion dollars with only a 3% return is still a 3 million dollar yearly profit. Add to this the fact that the mandrake mechanism virtually allows the banks to create the money out of nothing—which means they are not using their own money. Yes they create the money out of nothing and then profit from the interest charged on the loan. And finally even if the debtors eventually can’t pay (which they fully expect) and have to default. No problem. All loans are backed by the Federal Reserve or the European equivalent meaning that loans are guaranteed through taxation—the hidden tax of inflation. Meaning simply the Federal Reserve has guaranteed it will print the money to cover the loan if it goes bad—see all African loans. This method of guaranteeing loans only succeeds in devaluing already printed and earned dollars. Your dollars and my dollars.

More motives for bank loans from European and American banks.

The funding of terrorist guerilla forces destabilizes other countries (legitimate or not) in those regions. The funding of the Islamic Chechnyan rebels predicated Russia’s need to increase their own military might which necessitates the need for further bank loans to fund the Russian military expansion—remembering that the bank is only expecting to live off the interest payments. Now the bank collects interest from additional loans. Next the funding of terrorist groups, rogue states, and fledging countries alike necessitates an increase in military output in Free states—states such as Israel, England and America. Who profits from all of this instability? Banks whose loans are guaranteed in the first place by either the WTO or Federal Reserve.

The only way to rescue the world from constant war is a return to the gold standard. Returning to the gold standard would destroy the bank’s ability or a country’s ability to print money to fund profit with no risk.

7 Comments:

At 8:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pretty good analysis of the banking system.Now all you have to do is identify those banker robber barons and I would'nt be surprised if you find them all in one group of people with names like Baruch ,Rothchild etc. etc. Could Mel Gibson have hit the nail on the head?

 
At 11:10 PM, Blogger Joe Green said...

Why not add other assorted criminals Like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfwitz, Perle and little Billy Krystol??? And don't forget the Carlyle Group that brought together the business interests of the Bush Clan and the Bin Laudin Crime Families.

The problem with Ayn Rand, that whore of Babylon, is that she is a pervert, a writer that cannot resist changing the meaning of words, turning virtue into vice, and spinning gold into shit.

I am surprised to still find you in the blog sphere, I guess your CIA funding still has not run out spinning US propaganda in the Canadian Internet Space.

Why don't you just give it up.

 
At 8:51 PM, Anonymous ProfAlfred said...

Seriously, joe green, why insert phrases such as "whore of babylon" into your submissions? It negates any intellectual credibility you might nurture with the rest of your comment. I've seen you other places, and I just don't get it. Don't you WANT to be taken seriously? Or are your really just a precocious, pretentious 12 year-old after all?

 
At 11:05 PM, Blogger Joe Green said...

Do I wish to be taken seriously?
In a word, no.

If I wished to be taken seriously, I would publish my ideas in a peer reviewed paper or series of papers.

I come to this site, and other like it, to torment Objectivists, or if you wish to call them by their scientific name, "neocons".

You take offense at my use of the term "whore of babylon" specifically in relation to Ayn Rand, that high priestess of the Reformed Libertarian Church of Objectivism.

When you look at this cult, you would be well advised to keep in mind the clinical defintion of psychotic behavior. It fits perfectly the actual behavior of the Bush Administration, from Bush to Cheney, to Rumsfeld, to Wolfwitz and to little Billy Krystal.

All of them were inspired to script these Middle East wars in a fashion no different than the way Adolph Hitler was inspired to write Mein Kampf. None of these individuals have any sense of "right" or "wrong".

 
At 9:36 AM, Blogger angryroughneck said...

Joe you are a fabulous idiot that has no ability to think. I care little for the liberal/ conservative, communist/facist/socialist and neocon/dictator dichotomy. They are all manifestations of the collectivist ideology. There is only individualism and collectivism and untill you learn to distinguish you will remain willfully ignorant.

 
At 9:37 AM, Blogger angryroughneck said...

Joe you are a fabulous idiot that has no ability to think. I care little for the liberal/ conservative, communist/facist/socialist and neocon/dictator dichotomy. They are all manifestations of the collectivist ideology. There is only individualism and collectivism and untill you learn to distinguish you will remain willfully ignorant.

 
At 12:41 AM, Anonymous Fronzel said...

hahahaha I like joe green, make sure he comes back!! I am learning some funny turns of phrase. good use of hitler reference. (only my last sentence is sarcastic)

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home